With Lima Call For Climate Action, Eyes Turn To INDCs

The Lima Climate Talks wrapped up early Sunday morning with a bare-bones agreement on what constitutes a valid Intended Nationally-Determined Contribution (INDC) and a roadmap to year-end talks in 2015 that will begin with bottom-up proposals from countries and hopefully end with a convergence in Paris. With so little detail on INDCs, countries will have to step up individually by March.

14 December 2014 | LIMA | Peru | French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius summed up the outcome of the 20th Conference of the Parties (COP 20) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) as well as anyone.

“We have achieved in Lima a very good and useful agreement, which sets the basis for an agreement in Paris,” he said. “Manuel [Pulgar-Vidal] has been both very efficient and very diplomatic, because on the one hand he has been successful in achieving great agreement, but on the other hand, he has left some work to do for Paris.”

Laurent Fabius, who will head up the Paris Summit, told reporters the phrase “in light of different national circumstances” was “dramatic, new and very useful”, as it replaced the previous binary division between developing and developed nations.

Missing from the “Lima Call for Climate Action” is the laundry list of specific components that comprise a valid Intended Nationally-Determined Contribution (INDC), which are the country-specific emission-reduction proposals that countries are supposed to submit by the end of March, 2015. Instead, the 22-paragraph Lima agreement offers a procedure for enticing countries’ INDCs early in the year as rules come into focus through an iterative process of refinement. The agreement also contained a longer section that comprised the negotiating text for Paris, and that section contained many elements that had been contentious throughout Lima and remain unresolved. Included in the unresolved elements are the methods for accounting for land-use.



The 22 paragraphs on INDCs were less detailed than many had expected, and that will make the next three months especially critical as countries upload their INDCs to the UNFCCC web site. The proposals are supposed to contain specific emission-reduction targets and specific plans for achieving them.

“While the Lima summit fell short of expectations, the pressure is still on countries to put forward their best emissions reduction offers early next year,” said Alden Meyer, the director of strategy and policy for the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS). “The good news is that the world’s three largest emitters – China, Europe, and the U.S. – have already committed to do so, and others are expected to join them.”

Jennifer Morgan of the World Resources Institute (WRI), sees a race to the top.

“As contributions are put forward, peer pressure will grow for countries to be as transparent and ambitious as possible,” she said. “Support grew for establishing regular cycles to review and strengthen countries’ actions to curb emissions, adapt to climate change and support low-carbon growth. These cycles of improvement are critical to ensure the Paris agreement drives climate action for not years but decades to come.”

“The information for the INDCs is key,” added Pulgar-Vidal, the Peruvian Minister of Environment who served as President of COP 20. “The INDCs are key to having this balance between the bottom-up and the top-down process for Paris, and also because the INDCs are going to show us if there is a gap, what is the dimension of the gap.

An Old Rift

INDCs were created in the final hours of the Warsaw talks in an effort to bridge a gap between developing countries – primarily powerhouse up-and-comers like China and Brazil – and developed countries – primarily the United States. While US negotiators hoped that the introduction of INDCs would blur the distinction between developed and developing countries, China, backed by developing countries, managed to reintroduce language enshrining the obligation of developed countries to pay for “loss and damage”. US negotiators had opposed that language, arguing that China’s rate of economic development placed it in a different category from most other developing countries.

“There are deep and long-standing divisions on major issues including climate finance, which countries are more obligated to take action to reduce emissions, and whether to give greater priority to adaptation,” said Meyer. “These divisions nearly derailed the process in Lima; if they aren’t addressed, they threaten to block an agreement in Paris.”
A key stumbling block was the unwillingness of many countries, especially China, to submit to

“To avoid the worst impacts of climate change, we need a strong, science-based agreement that sets the world on a path to virtually eliminating heat-trapping emissions before the end of this century,” said Meyer. “The resistance by some countries to allowing scrutiny of their proposals is troubling.”

Pre-2020

The Lima decision included modest steps to increase ambition between now and 2020, including by providing technical support to developing countries to accelerate deployment of renewable energy technologies and other solutions to climate change. Unfortunately, there was no real progress on how to scale up financial resources towards the $100 billion per year by 2020 goal pledged by the U.S. and other developed countries five years ago in Copenhagen.

“Progress on the Green Climate Fund was a bright spot, with countries’ exceeding the $10 billion goal for 2014,” said WRI’s Morgan. “These funds will jump start a transition to a low-carbon and climate-resilient economy. It will be important to identify additional sources of funding that are on par with the scale of the climate challenge.”

Adaptation on the Ascendancy

UNFCCC Executive Secretary stressed the rise of adaptation onto the same level as mitigation, which will be done by providing more visibility to countries’ National Adaptation Plans (NAPs) and the Green Climate Fund. Pulgar-Vidal also launched a NAP Global Network involving Peru, the US, Germany, the Philippines, Togo, the UK, Jamaica, and Japan.

The Lima Information Hub for REDD+

Countries meeting in Lima made progress on providing support to avoid deforestation.Colombia, Guyana, Indonesia, Malaysia and Mexico formally submitted information and data on the status of their greenhouse gas emission reductions in the forest sector to the UNFCCC secretariat following a similar submission by Brazil earlier in the year.

These baselines are likely to increase the possibility of obtaining international funding under initiatives like Reduced Emissions from Deforestations and Forest Degradation (REED+).

In support of this, the COP President announced that an ‘information hub’ will be launched on the UNFCCC web site, spotlighting actions by countries carrying out REDD+ activities.

The aim is to bring greater transparency on both the actions being undertaken, including safeguards for communities and the payments being made.

Steve Zwick

I edit Ecosystem Marketplace, which is a news service focused on environmental finance. With this blog, I hope to offer coverage that is a bit lighter and more holistic than what we offer on EM.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *